Nearly every construction dispute is a payment dispute wearing a different label. Defect allegations appear when a final payment is requested. Schedule complaints surface when retainage is due. Backcharges materialize at closeout. The contractor who understands the payment rules, and preserved the documentation, is in a much better position than the one arguing about workmanship two years later.
The Law Offices of Albert Goodwin represents contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers in New York City in payment claims, and owners and general contractors defending them.
Article 35-E of the General Business Law regulates payment timing on private construction contracts above a threshold value, with exclusions including certain residential work on one-to-four-family dwellings and public work covered by other statutes. Its core provisions:
Invoking the Act, including the interest and the right to suspend, changes the dynamic of a payment negotiation and should be considered before a claim becomes a lawsuit.
Many subcontracts state that the general contractor's obligation to pay is conditioned on the general contractor first receiving payment from the owner, making the subcontractor a co-venturer in the owner's credit risk. New York's Court of Appeals held that such a clause is void and unenforceable as against public policy, because it operates as a prohibited waiver of the subcontractor's Lien Law rights.
The distinction that survives is between a pay-if-paid condition, which is void, and a pay-when-paid provision that merely fixes a reasonable time for payment, which is enforceable as a timing term. Drafters attempt to write the former in the language of the latter, and how a clause is characterized is frequently the central question in a subcontractor's collection case. The Lien Law separately provides that an agreement to waive the right to file or enforce a lien is void as against public policy, which is the foundation of the rule.
Retainage held on private projects is regulated. The Prompt Payment Act limits the amount that may be retained and requires that final payment of retainage be released within a defined period after final approval of the work. A contractor that has achieved substantial completion and delivered closeout documentation is entitled to release, and an owner withholding retainage over disputed punch list items must generally identify them rather than holding the entire sum indefinitely.
Retainage disputes usually resolve on documentation: the substantial completion date, the punch list as it existed and as it was completed, the closeout deliverables submitted, and the correspondence. Contractors who deliver closeout packages promptly and in writing, with a transmittal record, collect retainage far more reliably than those who do not.
New York law makes a general contractor on most private construction projects jointly and severally liable for wages owed to employees of its subcontractors at any tier, including liquidated damages and attorney fees, subject to a look-back period. The general contractor may demand payroll records, certified payrolls, and related information from subcontractors, and a subcontractor's failure to provide them can be grounds to withhold payment.
The practical consequences are significant. General contractors should build the record demand into the subcontract, condition payment on receipt of certified payroll and wage compliance certifications, require indemnification, and consider bonding or insurance requirements for subcontractors whose payroll practices cannot be verified. Subcontractors should expect the demands and be prepared to satisfy them, since inability to produce payroll records is now a payment problem as well as a compliance one. See wage and hour claims.
Lien waivers are exchanged routinely with progress payments and are frequently signed without review. The distinctions that matter:
The correction is straightforward: strike the general claim release, limit the waiver to lien rights for the amount received through the stated date, and reserve pending claims by identifying them expressly on the face of the waiver. A contractor who reserves claims in writing every month has preserved them. One who signs the form as presented usually has not.
A payment claim is worth what can be collected on it. The tools available in New York:
Owners and general contractors resisting payment typically assert defective or incomplete work, backcharges for another trade's corrective work, delay damages and liquidated damages offsetting the balance, failure to submit required documentation such as certified payrolls or closeout materials, unapproved change orders performed without written authorization, and failure to comply with the contract's notice provisions. Each of these is answerable, and each is answered with contemporaneous documentation rather than recollection: daily reports, photographs with dates, requests for information and the responses, meeting minutes, and the correspondence file.
We also represent owners, developers, and general contractors facing payment claims, where the work involves evaluating the claimed amounts against the contract and the actual work performed, asserting legitimate backcharges properly and on time, discharging overstated or untimely liens, invoking notice and documentation requirements, and resolving trust fund allegations that frequently accompany a subcontractor's claim.
Construction payment claims have short deadlines and long timelines. The lien period runs from your last day of work, the bond notice period may be shorter still, and each month you sign a waiver without reserving your open claims narrows what you can recover. Send us the contract, the requisitions, the waivers you have signed, and the correspondence, and we will tell you what is preserved, what is at risk, and what leverage the Prompt Payment Act gives you.
Call the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin at 212-233-1233 for a consultation.
You can contact us by phone at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected].