A performance improvement plan is presented as an opportunity. Sometimes it is one. Frequently it is the last step in a process that has already reached its conclusion, and its real function is to create a written record establishing that the company identified deficiencies, communicated them, and gave you a chance to correct them, so that the termination which follows looks documented rather than arbitrary.
Both versions look identical on the first day. The Law Offices of Albert Goodwin advises New York City managers and employees on how to read a PIP, how to respond to it, and what it means for what comes next.
Signs that a plan is genuine: the goals are specific and measurable, they are achievable within the stated period by someone in your role, resources or training are actually being provided, the manager is engaged in check-ins, the criticisms are consistent with what you have been told before, and the timeline is reasonable for the work involved.
Signs that a plan is documentation:
Absent a contract or a collective bargaining agreement, an employer in New York may terminate an employee at any time, for any reason or no reason, as long as the reason is not an unlawful one. There is no legal requirement to issue a PIP, no requirement that it be fair, and no claim for being placed on one that you did not deserve.
What the law does prohibit is termination or adverse treatment because of a protected characteristic or protected activity. So the question is never whether the PIP was fair. It is whether the real reason for it, and for what follows, was lawful. The PIP itself becomes evidence in that inquiry, and evidence can be read in either direction: the employer will use it to show a legitimate reason, and a well-handled response can undercut the plan's credibility as documentation.
The most common mistake is to sign the plan, say little, and try to work harder. The second most common is to write an angry email. Neither serves you.
A written response should do specific work:
Send it by email so the date is fixed, and keep a copy somewhere other than your work account, since access to that account can end without notice. Copy only the people who belong on it.
If a medical condition or disability is affecting your performance, a PIP is an appropriate moment to request a reasonable accommodation, and doing so triggers obligations on the employer's part. New York City's Human Rights Law requires a cooperative dialogue with the employee about accommodation requests, and the employer must engage in that process and provide a written final determination. Requesting an accommodation is protected activity, and terminating someone for making the request is unlawful even if the accommodation itself would not have been required.
Similarly, if you are eligible for family or medical leave, or New York Paid Family Leave, using it is protected, and performance criticism that begins on return from leave is a recognized pattern. See disability discrimination.
Almost always, yes, quietly and in parallel. Whatever the intent behind the plan, your position has been documented as deficient, which affects internal mobility and how you will be discussed. Beginning a search costs you nothing and preserves options. It also matters legally: if you are ultimately terminated and bring a claim, you have a duty to mitigate damages, and a documented search strengthens your position on back pay.
Resigning during a PIP, on the other hand, generally forfeits severance, may affect unemployment eligibility, and eliminates most claims. Unless there is a specific reason to leave, letting the process run is usually the stronger position. Where conditions are genuinely intolerable and deliberately made so, a constructive discharge theory may exist, but the standard in New York is demanding, and resigning first and analyzing later is rarely the right sequence.
An employee terminated for ordinary performance shortcomings is generally eligible for unemployment insurance in New York, since disqualification requires misconduct rather than inability to meet standards. An employee who resigns generally is not eligible absent good cause attributable to the employer. This is a concrete financial reason not to resign under pressure without advice.
Most PIPs conclude in one of three ways: the plan is completed and the employee remains, though often with the relationship altered; the employee is terminated at or before the end of the period; or the employee is offered a separation agreement in exchange for a release, which is common where the employer has some concern about the underlying facts.
That last outcome is where the preparatory work pays off. A separation offer is negotiable, and what you have documented during the PIP period, factual corrections, denied resource requests, the sequence relative to your complaint or accommodation request, is precisely what gives a lawyer something to work with. Severance amounts, the reference and non-disparagement terms, the characterization of the departure, continuation of health coverage, and the treatment of equity and bonus are all in play. Note that where a release covers age discrimination claims, federal law requires specific consideration and revocation periods, and additional disclosures apply to group terminations. See severance agreement review and wrongful termination.
See being investigated at work, employment discrimination, retaliation claims, and our practice for managers.
A PIP has a short response window, and the written record you create in that window is the most useful thing you will have if this ends badly. We review the plan against your performance history, help you draft a response that corrects the record without escalating, and tell you honestly whether what you are describing looks like a performance problem or something else.
Call the Law Offices of Albert Goodwin at 212-233-1233 for a consultation.
You can contact us by phone at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected].