Removing a commercial tenant in New York City is a complex legal undertaking governed by strict procedural rules, demanding timelines, and a court system known for its formality. A single misstep—an improperly drafted notice, a defective service of process, or a missed deadline—can result in the dismissal of your case and weeks or months of additional lost rent. Our firm represents commercial landlords, property owners, and managing agents throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island in commercial eviction matters, guiding clients efficiently through every stage of the proceeding.
If you are a landlord facing a defaulting tenant, an unauthorized occupant, or a tenant who refuses to vacate after the expiration of a lease, our attorneys can help you recover possession of your property and the rent you are owed while protecting your legal and financial interests.
Commercial evictions differ substantially from residential evictions. While residential tenants enjoy extensive statutory protections under New York law, commercial tenants are generally bound by the terms of their lease and have fewer protections. This means the lease agreement itself becomes the central document governing the rights and obligations of both parties. A well-drafted commercial lease can streamline an eviction, while a poorly drafted one can create unexpected obstacles.
Commercial eviction proceedings in New York City are brought in the Civil Court of the City of New York, specifically in the Commercial Landlord-Tenant part of the court located in the county where the property is situated. These proceedings are known as summary proceedings because they are designed to provide a relatively expedited resolution compared to ordinary civil litigation. However, "expedited" does not mean simple—the procedural requirements are exacting, and tenants frequently raise defenses and counterclaims that can prolong the process.
The type of proceeding you must bring depends on the nature of the tenant's default or the circumstances giving rise to the eviction. The two primary categories of summary proceedings under New York's Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (RPAPL) are nonpayment proceedings and holdover proceedings.
A nonpayment proceeding is the appropriate vehicle when a commercial tenant fails to pay rent that is due under the lease. Before commencing the proceeding, the landlord must typically make a written rent demand giving the tenant an opportunity to pay the outstanding amount or surrender possession. The terms of the lease and the requirements of RPAPL Section 711 dictate the form and timing of this demand. If the tenant pays the full amount owed, the proceeding generally ends; if the tenant fails to pay, the landlord may proceed to recover both possession and a money judgment for the unpaid rent.
A holdover proceeding is used when a tenant remains in possession after the lease has expired or has been terminated, or when the tenant has violated a substantial obligation of the lease in a manner that permits the landlord to terminate the tenancy. Common grounds for holdover proceedings include:
In most holdover cases involving a curable default, the landlord must first serve a notice to cure, giving the tenant a specified period to correct the violation. If the tenant fails to cure, the landlord serves a notice of termination ending the tenancy before commencing the proceeding. The precise notice requirements are frequently dictated by the lease itself, which is why a careful review of the lease is essential before taking any action.
While every case has its own particular facts, the typical commercial eviction in New York City follows a recognizable sequence. Understanding this process helps landlords set realistic expectations about timing and outcomes.
The first step is a thorough review of the lease to identify the relevant default provisions, notice requirements, and any conditions that must be satisfied before commencing a proceeding. Errors at this stage are among the most common reasons commercial eviction cases are dismissed.
Depending on the type of proceeding, the landlord must serve the appropriate predicate notice—a rent demand in a nonpayment case, or a notice to cure and notice of termination in a holdover case. These notices must comply with the lease and applicable statutes, and they must be served in the manner required by law. Defective predicate notices are a frequent source of dismissals.
If the tenant fails to comply with the predicate notice, the landlord files a petition and notice of petition with the court. These documents must be properly served on the tenant within the timeframes required by RPAPL Section 735. Service rules for commercial proceedings are technical, and improper service can derail the case.
The tenant has an opportunity to appear and respond, often by filing an answer asserting defenses or counterclaims. The matter is then scheduled for a court appearance, where the parties may negotiate a resolution, request adjournments, or proceed toward trial.
Many commercial eviction cases resolve through a negotiated settlement, often memorialized in a stipulation that may provide for payment of arrears, a date by which the tenant will vacate, or other terms. If no settlement is reached, the case proceeds to trial, where the landlord must prove its entitlement to possession and any money judgment.
If the landlord prevails, the court issues a judgment of possession and a warrant of eviction. The warrant authorizes a city marshal to remove the tenant from the premises. In New York City, only a marshal or sheriff may execute the eviction—landlords may never engage in self-help by changing locks or removing a tenant's property on their own.
One of the most important things every commercial landlord in New York City should understand is that self-help evictions carry significant legal risk. While New York law has historically recognized a limited common-law right to peaceable self-help reentry for commercial premises under certain narrow conditions, this remedy is fraught with danger. If a landlord locks out a tenant improperly, the tenant may bring an action for unlawful eviction, seek treble damages, and obtain an order restoring possession.
Given these substantial risks, the prudent course in virtually all cases is to pursue eviction through the courts using a proper summary proceeding. Our attorneys can evaluate the specific language of your lease and advise you on the safest and most effective path forward.
Commercial tenants and their counsel frequently raise defenses to delay or defeat an eviction. Anticipating these defenses and building a strong case from the outset is critical. Common defenses include:
A Yellowstone injunction is a particularly important consideration in commercial holdover matters. A tenant facing termination for a curable default may seek a Yellowstone injunction from the Supreme Court to toll the cure period and prevent forfeiture of the lease while the underlying dispute is litigated. These applications can substantially complicate and prolong an eviction, which is why proper handling of notices and timing from the outset is so important.
Recovering possession of the premises is often only part of a landlord's objective. Many landlords also seek to recover unpaid rent, additional rent such as taxes and operating expenses, attorneys' fees, and other damages permitted under the lease. A properly drafted commercial lease frequently contains a provision entitling the prevailing party to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, which can be a significant factor in the overall outcome.
In a nonpayment proceeding, the landlord may obtain a money judgment for the rent owed as part of the same case. In holdover and other situations, the landlord may need to pursue a separate action or claim to recover damages such as use and occupancy for the period the tenant remained in possession after termination. Our attorneys work to maximize the financial recovery available to landlords under the terms of their leases and applicable law.
The technical nature of commercial eviction proceedings in New York City makes experienced legal counsel invaluable. The difference between a swift recovery of possession and a prolonged, costly dispute often comes down to how carefully the early stages of the case are handled. From drafting proper notices to ensuring valid service, to anticipating and defeating tenant defenses, every detail matters.
Our firm brings extensive experience representing commercial landlords across all five boroughs of New York City. We understand the procedures of the Civil Court's commercial landlord-tenant parts, the strategies tenants commonly employ, and the practical realities of executing evictions through city marshals. We are committed to pursuing efficient, cost-effective resolutions while remaining fully prepared to litigate aggressively when necessary.
When you retain our firm, we provide comprehensive representation that may include:
If you are a commercial landlord dealing with a defaulting or holdover tenant, time is of the essence. Every day a non-paying tenant remains in your property represents lost income, and procedural mistakes can compound the delay. Our experienced commercial eviction attorneys are ready to protect your property rights and help you regain possession as efficiently as the law allows.
Contact our office today to schedule a consultation. We will review your lease, evaluate your situation, and provide clear guidance on the most effective strategy for resolving your commercial tenancy dispute in New York City.
You can contact us by phone at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected].